logo
Login Subscribe
Google Play App Store
  • News
    • Obituaries
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
  • Sports
  • E-edition
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertisers
    • Form Submission
    • About Us
    • News
      • Obituaries
      • Lifestyle
      • Opinions
    • Sports
    • E-edition
    • Calendar
    • Archives
    • Contact
      • Contact Us
      • Advertisers
      • Form Submission
      • About Us
To what degree should judicial review extend to the executive branch?
commentary
April 16, 2025
To what degree should judicial review extend to the executive branch?

So far in President Trump’s short second term his greatest adversary has been the judicial branch. Some of his programs have been blocked by federal judges while others already have been overturned.

This is nothing new. No matter which party the president has been in, there always seems to be a judge somewhere on the other side willing to at least temporarily block any presidential action. With so many questioning the authority of the judiciary branch, it is worth looking at what the Constitution says while also examining one of the most important documents on the subject.

First the Constitution.

Article III covers the judiciary branch and is the shortest article dealing with the three branches. Its main clause states, “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.” It then goes on to define who it has power over, like “between Citizens of different States.” What it does not define or even mention are the words judicial review or the court’s ability to declare a law unconstitutional.

Yet, as Alexander Hamilton wrote Federalist Paper No. 78, he seems to imply that the power of judicial review is inherent. As this document is considered one of the most consequential writings on the framers’ ideas of the courts it is worth examining.

To Hamilton, the most important part of Article III is that the judicial is a separate branch. At the end of the above clause, it states that judges hold their offices for life and cannot lose their compensation. Because of this, judges are not beholden to either Congress nor the president and are free to adjudicate without pressure.

With proper separation of powers, Hamilton states, “the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution.” His reason was that the executive branch has the enforcement power (military) and the Legislature makes the laws and controls the money or as Hamilton said, “The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.”

Hamilton then begins to discuss judicial review, while never actually using those words. He wrote, “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master.” He recognized that the legislative branch has the potential to overstep the Constitution and put their personal wills above the nations. Because of that, “The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.”

In other words, it is necessary for the courts to have the power to void any law created by Congress for the protection of the people. Hamilton wrote this paper in 1788 and while the founders seemed to have supported the idea of judicial review, it would not be codified in law until 1803 with the case of Marbury v. Madison.

The case stemmed from when Federalist John Adams left the White House after only one term and decided to stick it to Republican Thomas Jefferson by creating a bunch of new judge positions and quickly fill them with Federalist judges so that Jefferson would not have the ability to appoint judges any time soon. In the month before Adams left office, he appointed the judges, got them passed through the Senate and passed out most of the credentials.

However, Adams’ secretary of state John Marshall did not get all the credentials distributed, as he left to take over as chief justice of the Supreme Court. He instead left instructions for the new secretary of state, James Madison, to finish the task. Yet, upset with the appointment of the “Midnight Judges” Jefferson and Madison decided not to pass out the remaining credentials claiming their appointments null and void.

Long story short, one of the midnight appointments was William Marbury. And as all good Americans do, Marbury sued to force Madison to deliver his credentials. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court — the same court where Marshall now presided.

Marshall was in a difficult position; this was a first of its kind case. What if he ordered Jefferson to pass out the credentials and Jefferson said no. The court had no enforcement powers which could lead to a constitutional crisis.

Fortunately, Marshall would not have to find out as his decision stated that Jefferson and Madison should have handed out the credentials with a sort of shame on them. However, Marshall also said they did not have to because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 actually went against the Constitution making that law unconstitutional. It was the first case that set a precedence of judicial review, codifying it into American law.

It is clear from Hamilton and Marshall that judicial review was always thought of as part of the Constitution. It is the courts’ duty to make decisions about the constitutionality of laws. What Hamilton and Marshall don’t mention is the presidency. As I have mentioned several times over the years, neither Hamilton nor Marshall would have seen a need to subject the executive branch to judicial review as presidents did not yield the power of a modern president nor did they use executive orders to make laws or policies. It seems as if the same rules would apply to the president as the Congress, at least with the Supreme Court. Yet it also seems contrary to a balanced government that any lower judge at any time can stop the wheels of government for what could be purely political reasons.

James Finck is a professor of American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He can be reached at HistoricallySpeak-ing1776@ gmail.com.

Braving the festival, honoring a friend
A: Main, news
Braving the festival, honoring a friend
By LENORE BECHTEL 
September 3, 2025
Every Labor Day weekend since moving to Oklahoma, I thought about going to the Dusk to Dawn Blues Festival. But the idea of a yard party running from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. was intimidating—and I could neve...
A: Main, news
Man injured diving into shallow water
September 3, 2025
A 22-year-old Yukon man was injured when he dove from a pontoon boat into shallow water at Lake Eufaula, according to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. Patrick Tanner reportedly stopped his vessel to swim ...
A: Main, news
Man found dead in yard; possible suspect investigated
September 3, 2025
WARNER – Warner Police responded to a call early Saturday morning about a dead man laying outside of a residence in the area of Fifth and Third streets. The deceased has been identified as 51-year-old...
A: Main, news
Wellness Day for seniors Sept. 16
September 3, 2025
Heritage Home Care’s fifth annual Senior Wellness Day will be held Tuesday, Sept. 16, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. at 126 N. 1st St. (now Bridges Street), which is the former location of Family Dollar. The e...
A: Main, news
Looking ahead: Firm to help guide the way
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What will Eufaula look like in 50 years? Without a plan, it’s anybody’s guess. But the City Council has taken steps to remove at least some of the guesswork. At a special meeting Friday, Aug. 29, the ...
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
A: Main, news
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What: Vision Eufaula Wine & Art Festival When: Saturday Sept. 6, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Where: 150 N. Front St. Information: 405-248-2992 or visit visioneufaula.org The fourth annual Wine and Art Festival ...
ePaper
google_play
app_store
Editor Picks
5 in race for state school superintendent
news
5 in race for state school superintendent
By Jennifer Palmer Oklahoma Watch 
September 3, 2025
So far, five candidates are running to lead Oklahoma’s public education system as state superintendent in 2026. Former Tulsa school board members Jennettie Marshall, a Democrat, and Jerry Griffin, an ...
DOC Director stepping down
news
DOC Director stepping down
By KEATON ROSS OKLAHOMA WATCH 
September 3, 2025
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Steven Harpe, one of the highest paid officials in state government, will step down on Sept. 30 to take a private sector job. “I’m extremely proud of my tim...
news
Class of ’65 reunion set for Sept. 12
September 3, 2025
Graduates of the Eufaula High School Class of 1965 will get together from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Friday, Sept 12, at the Legacy on Main Street, 224 N. Main St. Graduates of the classes of ’64 and ’66 are...
A site out of this world
news
A site out of this world
By MIKE BARNES 
September 3, 2025
In Eufaula, a town where gossip can outpace the mail, a story is slowly gaining momentum. It isn’t about the latest fishing tournament or Friday night football, but about a cosmic visitor called 3I/ A...
Rest, reflections, and farewells
commentary
Rest, reflections, and farewells
By JOE DORMAN OICA CEO 
September 3, 2025
OKLAHOMA CITY – I hope your Labor Day weekend was full of relaxation. I schedule a vacation each year with friends to get away over this holiday which allows me to “charge up the batteries” for upcomi...
Facebook

THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL
100 N. 2nd Street
Eufaula, OK 74432

(918) 689-2191

This site complies with ADA requirements

© 2023 THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL

  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Policy