logo
Login Subscribe
Google Play App Store
  • News
    • Obituaries
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
  • Sports
  • E-edition
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertisers
    • Form Submission
    • About Us
    • News
      • Obituaries
      • Lifestyle
      • Opinions
    • Sports
    • E-edition
    • Calendar
    • Archives
    • Contact
      • Contact Us
      • Advertisers
      • Form Submission
      • About Us
Historically Speaking
commentary
April 30, 2025
Historically Speaking

There are many like me who may be a bit confused about tariffs.

In theory, tariffs, taxes on imported goods, seem like something I would support. After all, if nothing else, I am pro-America. And anything that gives Americans a leg up, I support. Now, if we can send aid to others, I support that, too. But just as other countries should put their needs before ours, as Americans, we must protect American interests first.

I am the first to acknowledge that economics is not my strongest subject and there are many much more knowledgeable than myself who say that the recent tariffs are harmful to America. The problem is when we hear someone really smart explain why tariffs are good, it makes sense, and we believe them. But then someone else really smart explains why they are bad — and again they make a good argument — we believe them. Many times, we find ourselves just agreeing with whomever spoke last or loudest.

Another issue regarding tariffs is the political divisiveness with everything involving President Trump. There may be economists who were pro tariffs until Trump won the presidency, and now are against them just because they hate Trump and vice versa. Diving into the subject, I decided to start at the source but also read a famous modern conservative economist’s thoughts on tariffs before the Trump administration to help me come to a better understanding.

While 1776 is mostly known as the year America declared its independence, economically it is better known as the year Scotsman Adam Smith wrote his magnum opus “The Wealth of Nations.” Known as the father of capitalism, Smith revolutionized how nations saw the world economy and believed it could be studied and understood using natural laws. As America’s adoration for capitalism is a second only to its love of democracy, it seems worth knowing Smith’s stance on tariffs. It’s easy: he was against them.

My goal is to soon read “The Wealth of Nations.” But knowing reading 18th century economic theory will be a challenge, I instead began with Mark Skousen’s 2006 book “The Big Three in Economics: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes,” to get a good foundation of economic thought over time. Skousen sees these three as the most important economic thinkers but does not see them as equal. He clearly believes Smith is at the top while Marx at the very bottom.

At its heart, Skousen believes Smith’s theory on capitalism is about free trade and competition, and tariffs, therefore, restrict free trade and “hinder the natural flow of goods and services, raising prices and causing inefficiencies.” Smith believed in the “invisible hand” or that market forces control the economy and “when nations specialize in what they do best and trade freely, they maximize wealth. Tariffs disrupt this process by artificially raising prices and encouraging inefficiency.” Smith believed that tariffs were a tax on the people that only benefited producers at the expense of everyone else. Free trade on the other hand “would lead to greater cooperation and peaceful relations between nations, fostering economic growth and mutual benefit.”

We do not know what Smith would say about Trump’s policies. Smith wrote his opus long ago, and the world has drastically changed since then.

With that in mind, I also read from a more recent economist who wrote before Trump came into office because most of the famous conservative voices online today are praising Trump’s America First policy. While I agree with the America First concept, this question remains: are we making sound economic policies?

Growing up in northern Virginia near George Mason University, one of the first economic professors to come to mind is Dr. Walter Williams, a conservative who put the university on the map and gained notoriety for guest hosting for Rush Limbaugh.

There is no questioning Williams’ conservative beliefs, so I wanted to find something he wrote about tariffs before Trump’s first term. I was fortunate to find an article he wrote for Investor’s Business Daily in early 2016 titled, “The Unseen Cost of Saving Jobs with Tariffs.”

Williams based his article around the idea of French economist Claude-Frédéric Bastiat’s “That which is seen and that which is not seen.” Williams said when making tariff policy, we must focus not only on what we see, but also what we don’t. His example was the 2002 tariff on steel that was raised to 30%. The “seen” was impressive. American steel prices rose, helping the steel industry and saving 1,700 steelworker jobs. But what about the “unseen?”

According to Williams, those 1,700 jobs cost American consumers $800,000 per job from the higher prices and damaged companies like car manufacturers who had to cut 16,000 jobs in Texas alone with thousands more in other states. Williams stated, “In other words, industries that use steel were forced to pay higher prices, causing them to have to raise prices on what they produced. As a result, they became less competitive in both domestic and international markets and thus had to lay off workers.”

Williams stressed that tariff beneficiaries are always seen while the victims are not, which is why politicians love them. I am not saying Trump’s tariff policies are wrong; I really don’t know. In our current world environment perhaps Smith and Williams would agree with Trump. Neither are around to comment. Williams died in 2020, and Smith, a little earlier in 1790.

If Trump is only using tariffs as tools for negotiations and America comes out smelling like roses then maybe economic textbooks will add new chapters. Only time can tell. And in the end, history will be the ultimate judge.

James Finck is a professor of American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He can be reached at HistoricallySpeaking1776@ gmail. com.

Braving the festival, honoring a friend
A: Main, news
Braving the festival, honoring a friend
By LENORE BECHTEL 
September 3, 2025
Every Labor Day weekend since moving to Oklahoma, I thought about going to the Dusk to Dawn Blues Festival. But the idea of a yard party running from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. was intimidating—and I could neve...
A: Main, news
Man injured diving into shallow water
September 3, 2025
A 22-year-old Yukon man was injured when he dove from a pontoon boat into shallow water at Lake Eufaula, according to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. Patrick Tanner reportedly stopped his vessel to swim ...
A: Main, news
Man found dead in yard; possible suspect investigated
September 3, 2025
WARNER – Warner Police responded to a call early Saturday morning about a dead man laying outside of a residence in the area of Fifth and Third streets. The deceased has been identified as 51-year-old...
A: Main, news
Wellness Day for seniors Sept. 16
September 3, 2025
Heritage Home Care’s fifth annual Senior Wellness Day will be held Tuesday, Sept. 16, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. at 126 N. 1st St. (now Bridges Street), which is the former location of Family Dollar. The e...
A: Main, news
Looking ahead: Firm to help guide the way
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What will Eufaula look like in 50 years? Without a plan, it’s anybody’s guess. But the City Council has taken steps to remove at least some of the guesswork. At a special meeting Friday, Aug. 29, the ...
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
A: Main, news
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What: Vision Eufaula Wine & Art Festival When: Saturday Sept. 6, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Where: 150 N. Front St. Information: 405-248-2992 or visit visioneufaula.org The fourth annual Wine and Art Festival ...
ePaper
google_play
app_store
Editor Picks
5 in race for state school superintendent
news
5 in race for state school superintendent
By Jennifer Palmer Oklahoma Watch 
September 3, 2025
So far, five candidates are running to lead Oklahoma’s public education system as state superintendent in 2026. Former Tulsa school board members Jennettie Marshall, a Democrat, and Jerry Griffin, an ...
DOC Director stepping down
news
DOC Director stepping down
By KEATON ROSS OKLAHOMA WATCH 
September 3, 2025
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Steven Harpe, one of the highest paid officials in state government, will step down on Sept. 30 to take a private sector job. “I’m extremely proud of my tim...
news
Class of ’65 reunion set for Sept. 12
September 3, 2025
Graduates of the Eufaula High School Class of 1965 will get together from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Friday, Sept 12, at the Legacy on Main Street, 224 N. Main St. Graduates of the classes of ’64 and ’66 are...
A site out of this world
news
A site out of this world
By MIKE BARNES 
September 3, 2025
In Eufaula, a town where gossip can outpace the mail, a story is slowly gaining momentum. It isn’t about the latest fishing tournament or Friday night football, but about a cosmic visitor called 3I/ A...
Rest, reflections, and farewells
commentary
Rest, reflections, and farewells
By JOE DORMAN OICA CEO 
September 3, 2025
OKLAHOMA CITY – I hope your Labor Day weekend was full of relaxation. I schedule a vacation each year with friends to get away over this holiday which allows me to “charge up the batteries” for upcomi...
Facebook

THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL
100 N. 2nd Street
Eufaula, OK 74432

(918) 689-2191

This site complies with ADA requirements

© 2023 THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL

  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Policy