logo
Login Subscribe
Google Play App Store
  • News
    • Obituaries
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
  • Sports
  • E-edition
  • Public Notices
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertisers
    • Form Submission
    • About Us
    • News
      • Obituaries
      • Lifestyle
      • Opinions
    • Sports
    • E-edition
    • Public Notices
    • Calendar
    • Archives
    • Contact
      • Contact Us
      • Advertisers
      • Form Submission
      • About Us
Constitution 101: Senate composition and vacancy clauses
commentary
January 15, 2025
Constitution 101: Senate composition and vacancy clauses

Section III of Article I of the Constitution is all about the Senate. When reading the original Section III before modern amendments, right away one might notice some differences in the Senate today from when the Founders created it, and I have found that most Americans are surprised.

Article I, Section III, Clause I of the Constitution States, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.”

The first, third and fourth parts have not changed: each state has two senators, each senator serves for six years, and each senator has one vote. The number of senators was a result of the “Great Compromise.”

One of the largest points of contention in drafting the Constitution was should representation be the same for all states as it was in the Articles of Confederation or should representation be based on population of the state.

As you can guess the larger states wanted proportional representation, but smaller states wanted equality. New Hampshire for one instructed its delegates to vote against any document that had proportional representation.

These smaller states had become used to equal power in the Articles of Confederation. This debate was so contentious that a special committee was formed to make a final decision.

It was decided that the lower house, the House of Representatives, the house that represented the people directly, should be based on population while the upper house, the Senate, the house that represented the states or the elites as it mimicked the House of Lords back in England should be equal, two each.

Having the Senate equal also protected the states from new amendments to the Constitution. In the House, larger states would have the votes necessary to get a two-thirds majority to pass any amendment over the smaller ones, but it would be impossible to do so in the Senate.

If how senators were chosen might sound confusing and shows that there was not originally as much democracy as we often think, “[Senators were] chosen by the Legislature thereof.”

According to the original Constitution, members of the House of Representatives were the only positions elected by the people. The members of the Senate were not chosen by the people until an amendment changed it in 1913.

This goes back to the discussion of a republic versus a democracy.

America was set up as a republic instead of a democracy mainly because the Founders did not trust the masses enough to give them a direct vote.

The people were supposed to choose a representative – one of their betters – to make decisions for them. Well, that concept went even further with the Senate. The Founders did not even trust the people to choose their own senators.

Whereas the House of Representatives was based on the House of Commons in England, it made sense that the representatives were chosen by those it directly represented.

However, the Senate was based on the House of Lords who were not chosen by the people. If the Senate represented the elites or the states themselves, then the Senators could not be beholden to the people. If the people chose them then they would have to answer to them. Instead, members of the state legislatures chose senators, so the senators now had to answer to the state instead of the people.

Something that has not changed is that senators are elected for six years. The difference in years from the House is again reflecting the importance of the two houses. The House represents the people and so the people need to make sure their interests are being represented by electing them every two years to keep them honest. By making the senate a six year term it would have much more stability.

Clause II was an extension of the six-year rule. It states, “Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year.”

Basically, what its saying is that while senators are chosen for six-year terms, a third of them will be chosen every two years. By not having all the senators chosen at the same time as the House, the Senate will have much more stability. In theory the House can replace all its representatives in any given election, while the Senate can only replace onethird. The two senators from each state will be staggered so there will always be an experienced senator if the other is replaced.

While the final part of Clause II was amended in 1913 with the 17th Amendment, it originally stated, “and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.” If a senator resigns or dies, the governor of the state can choose a replacement until the original senators term is up. For a member of the House a special election is called but for a senator the governor gets to choose.

Protecting the government from the masses was just as important to the Founders as protecting the people from the government. This is clearly seen in the way the upper house of Congress would not be swayed by the population.

James Finck is a professor of American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He may be reached at HistoricallySpeakingl 776@gmail.com.

Butler captured on Kerr Lake after two-week manhunt
A: Main
Butler captured on Kerr Lake after two-week manhunt
By AMIE CATO-REMER COURTESY 
March 4, 2026
After nearly two weeks on the run that included a reported kidnapping and a multi-county search, escaped inmate Robey L. Butler was captured Monday morning near Keota, bringing a tense manhunt to a sa...
Game Ball
news
Game Ball
March 4, 2026
EHS Superintendent Montie Guthrie accepts a game ball donation from Board Vice President Martha Asher. The game ball is signed by all the members and coaches of the 2020 Lady Ironheads basketball team...
Family and friends say farewell to Tracy Scroggins and his mother
news
Family and friends say farewell to Tracy Scroggins and his mother
By LaDonna Rhodes Staff Writer 
March 4, 2026
It was a sad day when Checotah heard of the passing of one of their own, Tracy Scroggins, whose name lives on at the field house and playground in his hometown. Scroggins passed away at the age of 56 ...
Mayor issues proclamation honoring late editor Jerry Fink
A: Main
Mayor issues proclamation honoring late editor Jerry Fink
By Shauna Belyeu General Manager 
March 4, 2026
On March 2, the Eufaula City Council opened its regular meeting by honoring the life and legacy of longtime journalist Jerry Fink. Mayor James Hickman read a formal proclamation recognizing the late E...
Heritage Home Care Inc. celebrates three years of patient-centered growth in rural Oklahoma
Community Calendar, news
Heritage Home Care Inc. celebrates three years of patient-centered growth in rural Oklahoma
March 4, 2026
Heritage Home Care Inc., a locally owned and operated home health agency headquartered in Eufaula, is celebrating its third anniversary of serving patients and families across eastern and southeastern...
Gear up and grab your green
Community Calendar, news
Gear up and grab your green
March 4, 2026
Break out the shamrocks, dust off the tutus and lace up those running shoes, the Eufaula Green Run 5K is back for its sixth year, bringing a splash of Irish spirit to the shoreline of Lake Eufaula. Ho...
ePaper
google_play
app_store
Editor Picks
C.A.R.D. Senior Nutrition menu
Community Calendar, news
C.A.R.D. Senior Nutrition menu
March 4, 2026
March 9 - March 13 121 High St., Eufaula Please call 918-689-3342 for meal reservations by 12 p.m. the day before services. Monday, March 9: Chili; baked potato; pears; crackers; cookie; milk Tuesday,...
City invests in firefighter safety with new protective gear
news
City invests in firefighter safety with new protective gear
By Shauna Belyeu General Manager 
March 4, 2026
The Eufaula Fire Department is better equipped to protect both firefighters and the community following a $147,000 investment approved by the Eufaula City Council in August for critical gear and equip...
Wild Onion Dinner
Community Calendar, lifestyle, news
Wild Onion Dinner
March 4, 2026
The Eufaula-Canadian Tribal Town will be hosting the annual Wild Onion Dinner on Saturday, March 14, 11:00 am to 2:00 pm at the Eufaula Indian Community Nutrition Center, 800 Birkes Rd., Eufaula. The ...
Saint Francis Health System expands in Eufaula
A: Main
Saint Francis Health System expands in Eufaula
March 4, 2026
Saint Francis Health System is proud to expand in Eufaula, working to bring emergency services back to the community. The health system is preparing an existing building near the former hospital site ...
Still singing forward
lifestyle, news
Still singing forward
By MICHAEL BARNES 
March 4, 2026
The Creek Baptist Alliance held its revival Feb. 22-25 at the Eufaula Indian Community Center. On the final night, the service opened quietly. People gathered and took their seats as conversations fad...
Facebook

THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL
100 N. 2nd Street
Eufaula, OK 74432

(918) 689-2191

This site complies with ADA requirements

© 2023 THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL

  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Policy