logo
Login Subscribe
Google Play App Store
  • News
    • Obituaries
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
  • Sports
  • E-edition
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertisers
    • Form Submission
    • About Us
    • News
      • Obituaries
      • Lifestyle
      • Opinions
    • Sports
    • E-edition
    • Calendar
    • Archives
    • Contact
      • Contact Us
      • Advertisers
      • Form Submission
      • About Us
Lady Justice is Blind. Why isn’t the Court?
commentary
June 26, 2024
Lady Justice is Blind. Why isn’t the Court?

Tragedy erupted on Oct. 1, 2017, at a country music festival in Las Vegas when a lone shooter killed 60 attendees from a 32nd story hotel window. Mainly using AR-15 style weapons with the help of a bump stock, the shooter carried out the deadliest mass shooting by a lone gunman in history.

Following the tragedy, President Donald Trump asked the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Agency to reclassify bump stocks as machine gun accessories and ban them.

However, a Texas gun store owner sued the federal government on the grounds that bump stocks were wrongfully classified. This past week the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the ban on grounds having nothing to do with gun control.

Here is the thing: while there is outrage over this decision – mainly because the decision looks political with a 6-3 split along party lines – what it actually shows is a misunderstanding of the courts and possibly the biggest mistake of the Founding Fathers with the Constitution.

First, let me be clear. I am not making any Second Amendment arguments here. I have written plenty on the Second Amendment and the Founders’ intentions. For this case, there is actually no need to bring up the Second Amendment. That is the misunderstanding. I am also not going to argue for or against gun control in any way. And neither did the court, or at least the six justices who voted against this ban. A large part of this ruling is that bump stocks do not make rifles automatic weapons.

There is a lot of hairsplitting here, but in legal cases, hairsplitting matters.

While bump stocks allow rifles to shoot as fast as an automatic weapon, they do not make them “automatic.” By definition an automatic rifle will fire more than one round with a single pull of the trigger. A bump stock works with a semi-automatic weapon which shoots one projectile per pull of the trigger. However, a bump stock uses the recoil of the rifle to create the same speed as an automatic but by definition does not make the weapon “automatic.” The mechanisms are different. I understand how this can be frustrating, but there is a difference, and in law those differences matter. If people want to change the rules about what is an automatic weapon, there is a way to do that and that brings up the second and more important point.

As you read the news and listen to podcasts you are going to read and hear a lot of definitions, such as what I have done above. What you may not hear is who made these definitions. That’s simple, Congress did. It did it in 1934 with The National Firearms Act.

When bump stocks first became available in the early 2000s the ATF did not consider them machine guns because they did not fit under the congressional definition, and so were not regulated. It was not until Trump asked the ATF to change their classification following the Las Vegas shooting that it changed. Here is the problem: according to the U.S. Supreme Court, the ATF does not have that authority.

As I like to do when looking at legal issues, let’s look at what the Constitution says about the ATF’s authority. Nothing. What it does say in Article I, Section 1 is “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

In other words, Congress has defined what an automatic weapon is with specific wording. Neither the ATF nor the president has the right to change it. At least based off this ruling, if Congress changed the definition of “automatic” and included bump stocks then the Court would support the ban.

I understand why this is hard. The fact that the ruling is 6-3 makes it seem political, so everyone is blaming the conservative judges. It’s similar to the abortion ruling by the courts that ruled states have the right to decide the legality of abortions. It was not a moral argument, but a legal one. In both cases it is hard to remove one’s personal beliefs, but that is what should happen.

Lady Justice is blindfolded. She is to be blind in her ruling and must only use the law, not emotions. What is more disheartening to me is that this case was not unanimous. Three justices cared more about their own beliefs than the law. You can be for strict gun control but still see this decision as legally correct. If you are mad, be mad at Congress, not the court.

The fact that the court was split on this verdict to me shows the greatest mistake of the Founders. They believed leaders could rise above parties and self-interest. Yet time and again we have seen that is not the case. Nowhere in the Constitution do they mention parties because they hoped Americans would avoid them. They were wrong. I cannot prove this, but as a thought experiment, imagine all nine justices were polled and asked, “Can the ATF override an act of Congress?” I have to hope all nine would say no. Yet when you place before them that same question but wrapped in a polarizing, politically emotional case and you see the justices divided on party lines. They made it about gun control because especially in an election year, they play politics more than act as blind justices.

If you want gun control, don’t be mad at the justices. The Constitution does not grant them power to make laws. If you are mad, get mad at Congress. Somewhere along the way in the start of the 20th century Congress got lazy. It found it easier to allow the Executive branch to do the heavy lifting. It’s a lot easier to get elected if you never have to vote on controversial issues. If you are mad at the court, be mad that they never stopped this sooner. For too long the courts have stood by and watched the Executive branch slowly usurp more and more power while the Legislature pretended to care.

Maybe instead of going to the internet to trash the courts and tell them blood is on their hands, we should all take a refresher on American civics. Lesson One: Checks and Balances.

James Finck is a professor of history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He can be reached at HistoricallySpeaking1776@ gmail.com.

Braving the festival, honoring a friend
A: Main, news
Braving the festival, honoring a friend
By LENORE BECHTEL 
September 3, 2025
Every Labor Day weekend since moving to Oklahoma, I thought about going to the Dusk to Dawn Blues Festival. But the idea of a yard party running from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. was intimidating—and I could neve...
A: Main, news
Man injured diving into shallow water
September 3, 2025
A 22-year-old Yukon man was injured when he dove from a pontoon boat into shallow water at Lake Eufaula, according to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. Patrick Tanner reportedly stopped his vessel to swim ...
A: Main, news
Man found dead in yard; possible suspect investigated
September 3, 2025
WARNER – Warner Police responded to a call early Saturday morning about a dead man laying outside of a residence in the area of Fifth and Third streets. The deceased has been identified as 51-year-old...
A: Main, news
Wellness Day for seniors Sept. 16
September 3, 2025
Heritage Home Care’s fifth annual Senior Wellness Day will be held Tuesday, Sept. 16, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. at 126 N. 1st St. (now Bridges Street), which is the former location of Family Dollar. The e...
A: Main, news
Looking ahead: Firm to help guide the way
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What will Eufaula look like in 50 years? Without a plan, it’s anybody’s guess. But the City Council has taken steps to remove at least some of the guesswork. At a special meeting Friday, Aug. 29, the ...
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
A: Main, news
Wine and Art Festival extravaganza Saturday
By JERRY FINK MANAGING EDITOR 
September 3, 2025
What: Vision Eufaula Wine & Art Festival When: Saturday Sept. 6, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Where: 150 N. Front St. Information: 405-248-2992 or visit visioneufaula.org The fourth annual Wine and Art Festival ...
ePaper
google_play
app_store
Editor Picks
5 in race for state school superintendent
news
5 in race for state school superintendent
By Jennifer Palmer Oklahoma Watch 
September 3, 2025
So far, five candidates are running to lead Oklahoma’s public education system as state superintendent in 2026. Former Tulsa school board members Jennettie Marshall, a Democrat, and Jerry Griffin, an ...
DOC Director stepping down
news
DOC Director stepping down
By KEATON ROSS OKLAHOMA WATCH 
September 3, 2025
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Steven Harpe, one of the highest paid officials in state government, will step down on Sept. 30 to take a private sector job. “I’m extremely proud of my tim...
news
Class of ’65 reunion set for Sept. 12
September 3, 2025
Graduates of the Eufaula High School Class of 1965 will get together from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Friday, Sept 12, at the Legacy on Main Street, 224 N. Main St. Graduates of the classes of ’64 and ’66 are...
A site out of this world
news
A site out of this world
By MIKE BARNES 
September 3, 2025
In Eufaula, a town where gossip can outpace the mail, a story is slowly gaining momentum. It isn’t about the latest fishing tournament or Friday night football, but about a cosmic visitor called 3I/ A...
Rest, reflections, and farewells
commentary
Rest, reflections, and farewells
By JOE DORMAN OICA CEO 
September 3, 2025
OKLAHOMA CITY – I hope your Labor Day weekend was full of relaxation. I schedule a vacation each year with friends to get away over this holiday which allows me to “charge up the batteries” for upcomi...
Facebook

THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL
100 N. 2nd Street
Eufaula, OK 74432

(918) 689-2191

This site complies with ADA requirements

© 2023 THE EUFAULA INDIAN JOURNAL

  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Policy